World News
Maersk Line: Deploying More Capacity is "Really Stupid, Stupid Strategy"
Overcapacity continues to plague the shipping market, leaving owners torn between contributing to the glut of tonnage and falling behind competitors who are ordering larger and more fuel-efficient ships, Dow Jones Newswires reports.
"It is a really stupid, stupid strategy to deploy more capacity," SΓΈren Skou, chief executive for Maersk Line told a shipping conference last month.
Skou has also warned that the industry could be close to a rate war unless more vessels are removed from service.
Maersk Line dropped its capacity by 14 percent last year, yet the company has also ordered 20 new triple-E ships with a capacity of 18,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) each.
Nils Andersen, CEO of Maersk Line's parent company, A.P. Moeller-Maersk (Maersk), recently said the company will introduce the Triple-E ships gradually while removing smaller ships to avoid flooding the market with more capacity.
China Shipping Container Lines Co. (CSCL) recently announced it is also ordering five of the ships.
Bigger Ships
Lars Jensen, chief executive of Danish research firm SeaIntel Maritime Analysis said that "in three to four years, major shippers will operate Europe-Asia with ships of 14,000 and above."
"Those who don't have these ships won't be able to compete."
Ship operators say that the larger vessels are more fuel-efficient and generally more cost effective, an important point when 23 of the 30 biggest shippers in the world lost money in 2012, according to shipping analyst Alphaliner.
Maersk Line says the Triple-E vessels will consume 35 percent less fuel per container than 13,100 TEU ships.
Also contributing to overcapacity in the industry is the difficulty shipowners find in selling vessels.
"The only option for getting out is scrapping," said one Greek ship owner.
"If I scrap, I'll be ruined as I can't pay the bank back and the bank will be saddled with nonperforming loans it can ill afford.
"So I limp along putting money into the ships from other parts of my business and hope for better days ahead."
Key Bunker Prices More
| VLSFO | MGO | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $/mt | +/- | $/mt | +/- | |
| Singapore | 624.50 | 1.00 | 732.00 | 8.50 |
| Rotterdam | 571.00 | 3.00 | 758.00 | 16.50 |
| Houston | 591.50 | 4.00 | 760.00 | 5.50 |
| Fujairah | 629.00 | 0.50 | 877.50 | 3.00 |
| Global 20 Ports Average | 637.00 | 0.00 | 819.00 | 3.00 |
| Global 4 Ports Average | 604.00 | 0.00 | 782.00 | 5.50 |
| Global Average Bunker Price | 688.00 | 2.50 | 879.00 | 1.00 |
Popular Now More
-
May 16The company is targeting 30-50% growth from this level of traded volumes in 2024, and in Q1 already saw 35% growth from the same period a year earlier, an Oilmar representative tells Ship & Bunker. -
May 16The ISO 8217 specifications last had a new full version published in 2017. -
May 16The first real data are starting to emerge on the cost paid by the container industry for shipping's inclusion in the European Union's emissions trading system.